People Leader Guide· a Bicycle Guide

Coming soon · Book Profile

Personnel Selection and Assessment

An edited international volume arguing that personnel selection and assessment must be understood and designed from the individual applicant's perspective as well as the traditional organizational one.

A profile of this book is on the way.

Get the book →

What it’s about

For decades personnel selection research optimized only the organization's cost-benefit calculus, treating job candidates as objects to be measured rather than as people whose perceptions, reactions, and welfare matter. This volume, assembled from an international conference of distinguished applied psychologists, systematically restores the individual side of the selection ledger. It introduces the organizing concept of 'social validity'—the degree to which selection situations offer information, participation, transparency, and feedback—and marshals empirical and theoretical chapters spanning recruitment, interviews, assessment centers, job analysis, motivational distortion, performance appraisal, feedback, fairness, team-based criteria, computer-assisted assessment, and complex problem solving. Read it to understand why technically valid procedures still fail, how applicant reactions shape utility, and how organizations can build human resource systems that are simultaneously competitive and humane.

The through-line

Who it’s for
An applied psychologist, HR practitioner, or selection researcher who wants selection systems that are both valid and humane.
The problem
Selection and assessment procedures are optimized for the organization but frequently repel, distort, or alienate the very candidates they are meant to evaluate. The practitioner feels professionally uneasy that a core psychological tenet—the welfare of the individual—is being ignored in employment settings.
The plan
  1. Adopt the individual-plus-organizational framework and the attraction-selection model.
  2. Apply the social validity concept: build in information, participation, transparency, and feedback.
  3. Study and design for applicant perceptions and reactions at each phase of selection.
  4. Reconsider criteria (team performance) and the goals of appraisal and prediction.
  5. Use contemporary tools thoughtfully to serve both parties, and evaluate systems for fairness as a whole.
The payoff
Selection systems that attract and retain qualified candidates while remaining valid and legally defensible. · Applicants who feel informed, respected, in control, and fairly treated. · Human resource systems that are simultaneously competitive and humane.

See our guide

Related profiles we’ve built

Additional reading